(36 of 1963)
[Act as on Date - Modified up to 1977]
[5th October 1963]
An Act to consolidate and amend the law for the limitation of suits and other proceedings and for purposes connected therewith. Contents:
BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fourteenth Year of the Republic of India as follows: -
PRELIMINARY
- This Act may be called the Limitation Act, 1963.
- It extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir.
- It shall come into force on such date 1[ ] as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint.
[1] The date so appointed is 1-1-1964 –See S.O.3118, Gaz.of Ind., 9-11-1963, Pt.Ii, section 3 (ii), p.3918.
-
"applicant" includes-
- a petitioner;
- any person from or through whom an applicant derives his right to apply;
- any person whose estate is represented by the applicant as executor, administrator or other representative;
- "application" includes a petition;
- "bill of exchange" includes a hundi and a cheque;
- "bond" includes any instrument whereby a person obliges himself to pay money to another, on condition that the obligation shall be void if a specified act is performed, or is not performed, as the case may be;
-
"defendant" includes--
- any person from or through whom a defendant derives his liability to be sued;
- any person whose estate is represented by the defendant as executor, administrator or other representative;
- "easement" includes a right not arising from contract, by which one person is entitled to remove. and appropriate for his own profit any part of the soil belonging to another or anything growing in, or attached to, or subsisting upon, the land of another;
- "foreign country" means any country other than India;
- "good faith"--nothing shall be deemed to be done in good faith which is not done with due care and attention;
- "plaintiff" includes--
- any person from or through whom a plaintiff derives his right to sue;
- any person whose estate is represented by the plaintiff as executor, administrator or other representative;
-
"period of limitation" means the period of limitation prescribed for any suit, appeal or application by the Schedule, and "prescribed period" means the period of limitation computed in accordance with the provisions of this Act;OBJECTS AND REASONSClause 2.-"The new definition of 'period of limitation' will make it clear that the period of limitation specified in the Schedule will have to be computed in accordance with the provisions of the Act; that is to say, wherever they apply, the sections will have the effect of extending the periods of limitation specified in the Schedule." –S.O.R.
The Law Commission in its Third Report observed as follows on this point-
"The expression "period prescribed" occurring in S.4 has been construed differently by different Courts.Some Courts take the view that it means only the periods of limitation prescribed in the Schedule to the Act and does not attract the extensions of the periods of limitation under the sections, which is obviously not correct.As the expression occurs in other sections also, it would be better if a new definition clause for "period prescribed" is inserted to the effect that it means the period the period of limitation computed in accordance with the provisions of the Act.We recommend accordingly." - "promissory note" means any instrument whereby the maker engages absolutely to pay a specified sum of money to another at a time therein limited, or on demand, or at sight;
- "suit" does not include an appeal or an application;
- "tort" means a civil wrong which is not exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of a trust;
- "trustee" does not include a benamidar, a mortgagee remaining in possession after the mortgage has been satisfied or a person in wrongful possession without title.
LIMITATION OF SUITS, APPEALS AND APPLICATIONS
- Subject to the provisions contained in sections 4 to 24 (inclusive), every suit instituted, appeal preferred, and application made after the prescribed period shall be dismissed, although limitation has not been set up as a defence.
-
For the purposes of this Act,--
-
A suit is instituted,--
- in an ordinary case, when the plaint is presented to the proper officer;
- in the case of a pauper, when his application for leave to sue as pauper is made; and
- in the case of a claim against a company which is being wound up by the Court, when the claimant first sends in his claim to the official liquidator;
- any claim by way of a set off or a counter-claim, shall be treated as a separate suit and shall be
deemed to have been instituted--
- in the case of a set off, on the same date as the suit in which the set off is pleaded;
- in the case of a counter claim, on the date on which the counter claim is made in Court;
- an application by notice of motion in a High Court is made when the application is presented to the proper officer of that Court.
-
A suit is instituted,--
Clause 4.-The Committee feel that the expression "a day when the Court is close" occurring in the clause should include any day when the Court is closed for a part of its normal working hours on that day.An explanation to this effect has been added.-J.C.R.-Gaz.of Ind., 20-11-1962, P.II, S.2, Ext., p.1033.
Clause 5.-tead of leaving it to the different States or High Court to extend the application of section 5 to applications order than those enumerated in that section as now in force, this clause provides for the automatic application of this section to all applications, other than those arising under Order XXI of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, relating to execution of decrees.In the case of special or local laws, it will be open to such laws to provide that section 5 will not apply.-S.O.R.-Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.II, S.2, Ext.pp.462, 463.
- Where a person entitled to institute a suit or make an application for the execution of a decree is, at the time from which the prescribed period is to be reckoned, a minor or insane, or an idiot, he may institute the suit or make the application within the same period after the disability has ceased, as would otherwise have been allowed from the time specified therefor in the third column of the Schedule.
- Where such person is, at the time from which the prescribed period is to be reckoned, affected by two such disabilities, or where, before the disability has ceased, he is affected by another disability, he may institute the suit or make the application within the same period after both disabilities have ceased, as would otherwise have been allowed from the time so specified.
- Where the disability continues up to the death of that person, his legal representative may institute the suit or make the application within the same period after the death, as would otherwise have been allowed from the time so specified.
- Where the legal representative referred to in sub-section (3) is, at the date of the death of the person whom he represents, affected by any such disability, the rules contained in sub-sections (1) and (2) shall apply.
- Where a person under disability dies after the disability ceases but within the period allowed to him under this section, his legal representative may institute the suit or make the application within the same period after the death, as would otherwise have been available to that person had he not died.
Clause 6.- This reproduces section 6 of the existing Act with the following modifications:-
- In sub-clause (4), a clarificatory amendment is being made by the substitution of the words "at the date of the death of the person whom he represents" for the words "at the date of death affected by any such disability";
- sub-clause (5), which is new, removes the conflict on the question whether when a person under disability dies after the disability ceases but within the time allowed to him by law to institute a suit, his legal representative can take advantage of the extended period to the same extent as in the case where the disability of a person continues up to his death.-S.O.R.-Gaz.of India, 19-6-1962, Pt.II, S.2, Ext., p.463.
Clause 6.- There is a conflict of judicial decisions as regards the application of existing section to an infant, en ventre sa mere.The Committee feel that it should be made clear that this clause applies also to a child in the womb, the age of majority being determinable in all cases as provided in the Indian Majority Act, 1875.The Explanation seeks to make the necessary provisions.-J.C.R.-Gaz.of India, 20-11-1962, Pt.II, S.2, Ext.p.1033.
Clause 7.- The word "discharge" in the existing section 7 has been liberally interpreted by the Courts to include all kinds of discharge, and not merely discharge of money claims.The Explanation is intended to make the position clear.It is also made clear that in the case of the manager of a Hindu joint family governed by the Mitakshara law, his authority to give a valid discharge can be inferred only when he is both the de jure and de facto manager.-S.O.R.Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.II, S.2, Ext., p.463.
Provided that, where letters of administration to the estate of a creditor have been granted to his debtor, the running of the period of limitation for a suit to recover the debt shall be suspended while the administration continues.
- Suits instituted in the territories to which this Act extends on contracts entered into in the State of Jammu and Kashmir or in a foreign country shall be subject to the rules of limitation contained in this Act.
- No rule of limitation in force in the State of Jammu and Kashmir or in a foreign country shall be a defence to a suit instituted in the said territories on a contract entered into in that State or in a foreign country unless--
- the rule has extinguished the contract; and
- the parties were domiciled in that State or in the foreign country during the period prescribed by such rule.
COMPUTATION OF PERIOD OF LIMITATION
- In computing the period of limitation for any suit, appeal or application, the day from which such period is to be reckoned, shall be excluded.
- In computing the period of limitation for an appeal or an application for leave to appeal or for revision or for review of a judgment, the day on which the judgment complained of was pronounced and the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the decree, sentence or order appealed from or sought to be revised or reviewed shall be excluded.
- Where a decree or order is appealed from or sought to be revised or reviewed, or where an application is made for leave to appeal from a decree or order, the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the judgment on which the decree or order is founded shall also be excluded.
- In computing the period of limitation for an application to set aside an award, the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the award shall be excluded.
Clause 12.- The existing section 12 is being amended,-
- to include application for revision within its scope;
- to provide expressly that the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the judgment in the case of an application for leave to appeal is also to be excluded
- to make it clear that any delay in the office of the court in drawing up a decree or order before the application for a copy thereof is made, shall not be excluded.-S.O.R.Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.II, S.2, Ext., p.463.
13.Exclusion of time in cases where leave to sue or appeal as a pauper is applied for.-In computing the period of limitation prescribed for any suit or appeal in any case where an application for leave to sue or appeal as a pauper has been made and rejected, the time during which the applicant has been prosecuting in good faith his application for such leave shall be excluded, and the Court may, on payment of the court-fees prescribed for such suit or appeal, treat the suit or appeal as having the same force and effect as if the court fees had been paid in the first instance.
- In computing the period of limitation for any suit the time during which the plaintiff has been prosecuting with due diligence another civil proceeding, whether in a court of first instance or of appeal or revision, against the defendant shall be excluded, where the proceeding relates to the same matter in issue and is prosecuted in good faith in a court which, from defect of jurisdiction or other cause of a like nature, is unable to entertain it.
- In computing the period of limitation for any application, the time during which the applicant has been prosecuting with due diligence another civil proceeding, whether in a court of first instance or of appeal or revision, against the same party for the same relief shall be excluded, where such proceeding is prosecuted in good faith in a court which, from defect of jurisdiction or other cause of a like nature, is unable to entertain it.
- Notwithstanding anything contained in Rule 2 of Order XXIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the provisions of sub-section (1) shall apply in relation to a fresh suit instituted on permission granted by the Court under rule 1 of that Order, where such permission is granted on the ground that the first suit must fail by reason of a defect in the jurisdiction of the court or other cause of a like nature.
- in excluding the time during which a former civil proceeding was pending, the day on which that proceeding was instituted and the day on which it ended shall both be counted;
- a plaintiff or an applicant resisting an appeal shall be deemed to be prosecuting a proceeding;
- misjoinder of parties or of causes of action shall be deemed to be a cause of a like nature with defect of jurisdiction.
Clause 13.- Clause 13 is section 14 of the existing Act with the following changes:-
In sub-clause (1) for the words "cause of action" the words "matter in issue" are being substituted as the former expression tends to make the relief too narrow.
In sub-clause (3), which is new, it is provided that if a suit or application is withdrawn under Order XXIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, on grounds similar to those specified in this clause, the time spent in prosecution such proceedings shall be excluded.There is no justification for a litigant this right when the grounds of withdrawal are those contemplated by this clause and to this extent Order XXIII, Rule 12 requires to be superseded.
Incidentally, prior proceedings in a Court of revision are also brought within the scope of the clause.-S.O.R.Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.II, S.2, Ext., pp.463, 464.
- In computing the period of limitation for any suit or application for the execution of a decree, the institution or execution of which has been stayed by injunction or order, the time of the continuance of the injunction or order, the day on which it was issued or made, and the day on which it was withdrawn, shall be excluded.
- In computing the period of limitation for any suit of which notice has been given, or for which the previous consent or sanction of the Government or any other authority is required, in accordance with the requirements of any law for the time being in force, the period of such notice or, as the case may be the time required for obtaining such consent or sanction shall be excluded.
- In computing the period of limitation for any suit or application for execution of a decree by any receiver or interim receiver appointed in proceedings for the adjudication of a person as an insolvent or by any liquidator or provisional liquidator appointed in proceedings for the winding up of a company, the period beginning with the date of institution of such proceeding and ending with the expiry of three months from the date of appointment of such receiver or liquidator, as the case may be, shall be excluded.
- In computing the period of limitation for a suit for possession by a purchaser at a sale in execution of a decree, the time during which a proceeding to set aside the sale has been prosecuted shall be excluded.
- In computing the period of limitation for any suit the time durin>g which the defendant has been absent from India and from the territories outside India under the administration of the Central Government, shall be excluded.
Clause 14 (Now S.15).- In sub-clause (2) provision is made for excluding the time taken in obtaining the consent of the Central Government or any other authority for instituting any proceedings (for example, under section 86 and 87 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908).Such cases are analogous to those which provide for statutory notices, the period of which is excluded by the existing section.
Sub-section (3) is new.It is common knowledge that by the time a receiver or liquidator is appointed in insolvency or liquidation proceedings and the receiver or liquidator after getting information about the assets and liabilities of the estate sits down to the task of realising the assets of the estate, claims in favour of such estate or company get barred to the detriment of the persons entitled to the benefits of the assets.To avoid this hardship this sub-clause provides that the period between the filling of the petition for winding up or adjudication and the appointment of the receiver (including interim receiver) or liquidator (including a provisional liquidator) and a period of three months thereafter (to enable him to acquaint himself with the affairs of the estate) should be excluded.
Sub-clause (4) and (5) reproduce sections 13 and 16 of the existing Act.-S.O.R.Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.II, S.2, Ext., p.464.
- Where a person who would, if he were living, have a right to institute a suit or make an application dies the right accrues, or where a right to institute a suit or make an application accrues only on the death of a person, the period of limitation shall be computed from the time when there is a legal representative of the deceased capable of instituting such or making such application.
- Where a person against whom, if he were living, a right to institute a suit or make an application would have accrued dies before the right accrues, or where a right to institute a suit or make an application against any person accrues on the death of such person, the period of limitation shall be computed from the time when there is a legal representative of the deceased against whom the plaintiff may institute such or make such application.
- Nothing in sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) applies to suits to enforce rights of pre-emption or to suits for the possession of immovable property or of a hereditary office.
Clause 15 (section 16 now).- Section 17 of the existing Act is confined to rights of action accruing after death.In Meyappa v.Subramanya (20 CWN 833), the Privy Council observed that when the cause of action arises in favour of a deceased person after his death time will at once begin to run.Some Courts have applied section 17 to cases where the right accrues on death as in the case of partnerships.The clause, as now proposed to be amended, will make it applicable to rights of action accruing on death or thereafter.-S.O.R.
- Where, in the case of any suit or application for which a period of limitation is prescribed by this Act,--
- the suit or application is based upon the fraud of the defendant or respondent or his agent; or
- the knowledge of the right or title on which a suit or application is founded is concealed by the fraud of any such person as aforesaid; or
- the suit or application is for relief from the consequences of a mistake; or
- where any document necessary to establish the right of the plaintiff or applicant has been fraudulently concealed from him;
the period of limitation shall not begin to run until the plaintiff or applicant has discovered the fraud or the mistake or could, with reasonable diligence, have discovered it; or in the case of a concealed document, until the plaintiff or the applicant first had the means of producing the concealed document or compelling its production:
Provided that nothing in this section shall enable any suit to be instituted or application to be made to recover or enforce any charge against, or set aside any transaction affecting, any property which--
- in the case of fraud, has been purchased for valuable consideration by a person who was not a party to the fraud and did not at the time of the purchase know, or have reason to believe, that any fraud had been committed, or
- in the case of mistake, has been purchased for valuable consideration subsequently to the transaction in which the mistake was made, by a person who did not know, or have reason to believe, that the mistake had been made, or
- in the case of a concealed document, has been purchased for valuable consideration by a person who was not a party to the concealment and, did not at the time of purchase know, or have reason to believe, that the document had been concealed.
- Where a judgment-debtor has, by fraud or force, prevented the execution of a decree or order within the period of limitation, the court may, on the application of the judgment-creditor made after the expiry of the said period extend the period for execution of the decree or order:
Provided that such application is made within one year from the date of the discovery of the fraud or the cessation of force, as the case may be.
Clause 16.- Section 18 of the existing Act has been re-cast on the lines of section 26 of the Limitation Act, 1939, of the United Kingdom so as to include actions based on fraud and also for relief founded on mistake.The clause also seeks to afford suitable protection to purchasers for valuable consideration in all such cases.
Sub-clause (2) incorporates the principle contained in the proviso to section 48 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which now finds a place in this Bill (see Art.135).The benefit is, however, made available only if the application for extension is made within one year from the date of discovery of the fraud or cessation of force.-S.O.R.Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.II, section 2, Ext., pp.464, 465.
- Where, before the expiration of the prescribed period for a suit or application in respect of any property or right, an acknowledgement of liability in respect of such property or right has been made in writing signed by the party against whom such property or right is claimed, or by any person through whom he derives his title or liability, a fresh period of limitation shall be computed from the time when the acknowledgement was so signed.
- Where the writing containing the acknowledgement is undated, oral evidence may be given of the time when it was signed; but subject to the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, (1 of 1872) oral evidence of its contends shall not be received.
- (a) an acknowledgement may be sufficient though it omits to specify the exact nature of the property or right, or avers that the time for payment, delivery, performance or enjoyment has not yet come or is accompanied by a refusal to pay, deliver, perform or permit to enjoy, or is coupled with a claim to setoff, or is addressed to a person other than a person entitled to the property or right,
- the word "signed" means signed either personally or by an agent duly authorised in this behalf, and
- an application for the execution of a decree or order shall not be deemed to be an application in respect of any property or right.
Clause 17.- Under the Schedule as now proposed, the time limit of 12 years for execution applications would not be capable of extension and, therefore, Explanation (c) makes it clear that an application for the execution of a decree or order shall not be deemed to be an application in respect of any property or right.Otherwise, that reproduces section 19 of the existing Act.-S.O.R.-Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.II, section 2, Ext., p.465.
Provided that, save in the case of payment of interest made before the 1st day of January, 1928, an acknowledgement of the payment appears in the handwriting of, or in a writing signed by, the person making the payment.
- where mortgaged land is in the possession of the mortgagee, the receipt of the rent or produce of such land shall be deemed to be a payment;
- "debt" does not include money payable under a decree or order of a Court.
Clause 18.- For the reasons stated against clause 17, the Explanation is amended to provide that the expression "debt" shall not include money payable under a decree or order of a Court.-S.O.R.Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.II, section 2, Ext., p.465.
- The expression "agent duly authorised in this behalf" in sections 18 and 19 shall, in the case of a person under disability, include his lawful guardian, committee or manager or an agent duly authorised by such guardian, committee or manager to sign the acknowledgement or make the payment.
- Noting in the said sections renders one of several joint contractors, partners, executors or mortgagees chargeable by reason only of a written acknowledgement signed by, or of a payment made by, or by the agent of, any other or others of them.
- For the purposes of the said sections,--
- an acknowledgement signed or a payment made in respect of any liability by, or by the duly authorised agent of, any limited owner of property who is governed by Hindu law, shall be a valid acknowledgement or payment, as the case may be, against a reversioner succeeding to such liability; and
- where a liability has been incurred by, or on behalf of a Hindu undivided family as such, an acknowledgement or payment made by, or by the duly authorised agent of, the manager of the family for the time being shall be deemed to have been made on behalf of the whole family.
- Where after the institution of a suit, a new plaintiff or defendant is substituted or added, the suit shall, as regards him, be deemed to have been instituted when he was so made a party:
Provided that where the Court is satisfied that the omission to include a new plaintiff or defendant was due to mistake made in good faith it may direct that the suit as regards such plaintiff or defendant shall be deemed to have been instituted on any earlier date.
- Nothing in sub-section (1) shall apply to a case where a party is added or substituted owing to assignment or devolution of any interest during the pendency of a suit or where a plaintiff is made a defendant or a defendant is made a plaintiff.
Clause 20.- The existing section 22 is being amended to that an omission to implead a person owing to a bona fide mistake does not deprive him of his rights against that person if the Court is satisfied in that behalf.-S.O.R.Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.II, section 2, Ext., p.465.
In the case of a continuing breach of contract or in the case of a continuing tort, a fresh period of limitation begins to run at every moment of the time during which the breach or the tort, as the case may be, continues.
In the case of a suit for compensation for an act which does not give rise to a cause of action unless some specific injury actually results therefrom, the period of limitation shall be computed from the time when the injury results.
All instruments shall for the purposes of this Act be deemed to be made with reference to the Gregorian calendar.
ACQUISITION OF OWNERSHIP BY POSSESSION
- Where the access and use of light or air to and for any building have been peaceably enjoyed therewith as an easement, and as of right, without interruption, and for twenty years, and where any way or watercourse or the use of any water or any other easement (whether affirmative or negative) has been peaceably and openly enjoyed by any person claiming title thereto as an easement and as of right without interruption and for twenty years, the right to such access and use of light or air, way, watercourse, use of water, or other easement shall be absolute and indefeasible.
- Each of the said periods of twenty years shall be taken to be a period ending within two years next before the institution of the suit wherein the claim to which such period relates is contested.
- Where the property over which a right is claimed under sub-section (1) belongs to the Government that sub-section shall be read as if for the words "twenty years" the words "thirty years" were substituted.
Clauses 24 to 26.- These reproduce sections 26, 27 and 28 of the existing Act.Sections 26 and 27 deal with the acquisition of rights of easement by prescription on the basis that prescription is really ancillary to the law of limitation.Limitation of actions is the procedural equivalent of the prescription of rights.The two sections also prescribe a period of limitation for the bringing of suits relating to easements acquired by prescription and also deal with the computation of the period prescribed therefor.Section 28 is a general provision and deals with the extinguishment of right to property, whether movable or immovable.The Law Commission has proposed that sections 26 and 27 of the existing Act should be repealed and the Indian Easements Act, 1882, should be extended to the territories to which sections 26 and 27 now apply in order to secure uniformity in the law.The Indian Easements Act, 1882, which extends only to a few States, deal exhaustively with the law relating to easements and licences, their acquisition, transfer etc., and in pith and substance is a law relating to rights in or over land (an entry in the State list) and therefore it is not possible by a Parliamentary law to extend that Act to those parts of India to which it does not now extend.On the other hand, it would have been possible for Parliament to extend sections 26 and 27 of the existing Act to those parts of India to which the Indian Easements Act, 1882, now applies and thereby secure some measure of uniformity.Sections 26 and 27 to a large extent correspond to sections 15 and 16 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882.As sections 15 and 16 are more exhaustive, the better course would be to retain sections 26 and 27 in this Bill for the time being and this is what clauses 24 and 25 seek to do.As and when the Indian Easements Act, 1882, is made applicable to any State by State legislation, clauses 24 and 25 would automatically become inapplicable by reason of the provisions contained in clause 28 (4).-S.O.R.Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.II, section 2, Ext., pp.465, 466.
Orissa:
In its application to the State of Orissa, S.25 is repealed – Orissa Act 24 of 1967, section 3 (31-8-1967).
Please Refer section 25
Orissa:
In its application to the State of Orissa, section 26 is repealed – Orissa Act 24 of 1967, section 3 (31-8-1967).
Please Refer section 25
MISCELLANEOUS
- Nothing in this Act shall affect section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
- Where any special or local law prescribes for any suit, appeal or application a period of limitation different from the period prescribed by the Schedule, the provisions of section 3 shall apply as if such period were the period prescribed by the Schedule and for the purpose of determining any period of limitation prescribed for any suit, appeal or application by any special or local law, the provisions contained in sections 4 to 24 (inclusive) shall apply only in so far as, and to the extent to which, they are not expressly excluded by such special or local law.
- Save as otherwise provided in any law for the time being in force with respect to marriage and divorce, nothing in this Act shall apply to any suit or other proceeding under any such law.
- Sections 25 and 26 and the definition of "easement" in section 2 shall not apply to cases arising in the territories to which the Indian Easements Act, 1882, may for the time being extend.
Clause 28.- Sub-clause (2) amends section 29 (2) of the existing Act to provide that the principles contained in clauses 4 to 23 apply uniformly to all special or local laws in the absence of any local law excluding the application of any or all of those provisions in any given case.
Sub-clause (3) amplifies section 29 (3) of the existing Act so as to exclude the application of this law to suits under any law dealing with marriage or divorce.-S.O.R.Gaz.of India, 19-6-1962, Pt.II, section 2, Ext., p.466.
- any suit for which the period of limitation is shorter than the period of limitation prescribed by the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, may be instituted within a period of a*[seven years] next after the commencement of this Act, or within the period prescribed for such suit by the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, whichever period expires earlier;
- any appeal or application for which the period of limitation is shorter than the period of limitation prescribed by the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, may be preferred or made within a period of ninety days next after the commencement of this Act or within the period prescribed for such appeal or application by the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, whichever, period expires earlier.
b*[Provided that if in respect of any such suit, the said period of seven years expires earlier than the period of limitation prescribed therefor under the Indian Limitation Act, 1908 and the said period of seven years together with so much of the period of limitation in respect of such suit under the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, as has already expired before the commencement of this Act is shorter than the period prescribed for such suit under this Act, then, the suit may be instituted within the period of limitation prescribed therefor under this Act.]
[a] Substituted for the words "five years", and deemed to have been so substituted, by the Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1969 (10 of 1969), section 2 (a).
[b] Inserted, ibid, section 2 (b) (26-3-1969).
(Under Article 371-F of the Constitution)
In its application to the State of Sikkim, for section 30, substitute as under:-
"Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, any suit, appeal or application, which could be instituted, preferred or made before the commencement of this Act and for which the period of limitation is shorter than the period provided therefor by the law in Sikkim immediately before such commencement, may be instituted, preferred or made within the period provided by such law."-See Gaz.of Ind., 29-7-1983, Pt.II, S.3 (ii), Ext., p.4 (No.329) (22-7-1983).
Clauses 29 and 30.- Suitable provisions are being made to cover cases where the period of limitation is being reduced, a longer period being allowed in the case of suits for redemption, etc., as the period is being reduced from sixty years to thirty years in such cases.In cases where the period is increased but the cause of action has already become barred, clause 30 makes it clear that the rights will not be revived thereby.-S.O.R.Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.II, S.2, Ext., p.466.
Clause 30 (Original clause 29.)-The Committee are of the view that as substantial changes are being made in the existing law of limitation, it is desirable to give litigants sufficient time for getting familiar with the new law.Hence the period of two years provided in part (a) of the clause has been extended to five years and the period of thirty days has been extended to ninety days in part (b) of the clause.The proviso to part (a) has been omitted as unnecessary.-J.C.R.Gaz.of Ind., 20-11-1962, Pt.II, S.2, Ext., p.1034.
- enable any suit, appeal or application to be instituted, preferred or made, for which the period of limitation prescribed by the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, expired before the commencement of this Act; or
- affect any suit, appeal or application instituted, preferred or made before, and pending at, such commencement.
(Under article 371F of the Constitution)
In its application to the State of Sikkim, in S.31 (a) for the words "Indian Limitation Act, 1908, expired before the commencement of this Act," substituted the words "law in force in Sikkim immediately before the commencement of this Act, expired before such commencement."-See Gaz.of Ind., 29-7-1983, Pt.II, section 3 (ii), Ext., P.4 (No.329) (22-7-1983).
(Periods of Limitation)
[See sections 2(j) and 3]
GENERAL NOTE ON ARTICLES
The existence of so many articles in the Limitation Act, 1908, made the subject very complex and has also been responsible for conflict of judicial decisions.In the Limitation Act, 1908, articles were grouped according to the periods prescribed.This was neither rational nor convenient.Most of the articles relating to suits fell under distinct subjects.The Law Commission of India in their Third Report on the Limitation Act, 1908, therefore, took the view that if the articles should be grouped subjectwise and a uniform period be fixed for suits of the same nature a considerable measure of simplicity could be achieved.Similarly, as regards the articles relating to appeals and applications the Commission considered that uniform periods should be prescribed as far as possible as it would conduce to simplicity.In the process of evolving a uniform period of limitation it was held necessary to increase the existing periods in some cases.
The Commission also proposed that all articles in which the date in column three coincides with the accrual of the cause of action should be grouped together and the date of the accrual of the cause of action be specified as the starting point of limitation and that where the two dates do not coincide, the existing article should be retained with such changes as may be necessary.The Commission also recommended that it must be left to the Courts to determine what constitutes the cause of action and to determine the date of its accrual by applying the well established principles to proved facts.
Sl. No. | Description of suit | Period of limitation | Time from which period begins to run |
---|---|---|---|
PART I.– SUITS RELATING TO ACCOUNTS | |||
1. | For the balance due on a mutual, open and current account, where there have been reciprocal demands between the parties. | Three years. | The close of the year in which the last item admitted or proved is entered in the account; such year to be computed as in the account. |
2. | Against a factor for an account. | Three years. | When the account, is during the continuance of the agency, demanded and refused or, where no such demand is made, when the agency terminates. |
3. | By a principal against his agent for ovable property received by the latter and not accounted for | Three years. | When the account is, during the continuance of the agency, demanded and refused or, where no such demand is made, when the agency terminates. |
4. | Other suits by principals against agents for neglect or misconduct | Three years. | When the neglect or misconduct becomes known to the plaintiff. |
5. | For an account and a share of the profits of a dissolved partnership. | Three years. | The date of the dissolution. |
PART II.—SUITS RELATING TO CONTRACTS | |||
"Articles 6 to 55 relating to contracts, including implied contracts and quasi contracts, correspond to existing articles 7 to 9, 30, 31, 43, 50 to 84, 86, 87, 99 to 102, 107 to 111, 113, 115 and 116.All these articles are now grouped together, the period being fixed at 3 years in all these cases.Wherever possible, articles which can be dealt with together have been combined.(Example: articles 7 and 102 have been combined in the new article 7).Similarly article which may conveniently be omitted in favour of residuary entry have been omitted.(Example, articles 80, 83, 84, 108 and 116 have all been omitted in favour of the new residuary entry 113).The distinction between contracts in writing registered and other contracts is being done away with as not being necessary and the uniformity in the period prescribed for all suits founded on contracts is being done away with as not being necessary and the uniformity in the period prescribed for all suits founded on contracts (including those falling under the residuary entry 13) will remove the ever arising conflict under the present law as to which article applies – whether the residuary article providing for a longer period of limitation or any other specific article providing for a shorter period." | |||
S.O.R.–Gaz.of India, 19-6-1962, P.II, S.2, Ext., Pp.466, 467. | |||
6. | For a seaman's wages. | Three years. | The end of the voyage during which the wages are earned. |
7. | For wages in the case of any other person. | Three years. | When the wages accrue due. |
8. | For the price of food or drink sold by the keeper of a hotel, tavern or lodging-house. | Three years. | When the food or drink is delivered. |
9. | For the price of lodging. | Three years. | When the price becomes payable. |
10. | Against a carrier for compensation for losing or injuring goods. | Three years. | When the loss or injury occurs. |
11. | Against a carrier for compensation for non-delivery of, or delay in delivering goods. | Three years. | When the goods ought to be be delivered. |
12. | For the hire of animals, vehicles, boats or house-hold furniture. | Three years. | When the hire becomes payable. |
13. | the balance of moneyadvanced in payment of goods to be delivered. | Three years. | When the goods ought to be delivered. |
14. | For the price of goods sold and delivered where no fixed period of credit is agreed upon. | Three years. | The date of the delivery of the goods. |
15. | For the price of goods sold and delivered to be paid for after the expiry of a fixed period of credit. | Three years. | When the period of credit expires. |
Sl. No. | Description of suit | Period of limitation | Time from which period begins to run |
---|---|---|---|
16. | For the price of goods sold and delivered to be paid for by a bill of exchange, no such bill being given. | Three years. | When the period of the proposed bill elapses. |
17. | For the price of trees or growing crops sold by the plaintiff to the defendant where no fixed period of credit is agreed upon. | Three years | For the price of trees or growing |
18. | For the price of work done bythe plaintiff for the defendant at his request, where no time has been fixed for payment. | Three years | When the work is done |
19. | For money payable for money lent. | Three years. | When the loan is made. |
20. | Like suit when the lender has given a cheque for the money. | Three years. | When the cheque is paid. |
21. | For money lend under an agreement that it shall be payable on demand. | Three years. | When the loan is made. |
22. | For money deposited under an agreement that it shall be payable on demand, including money of a customer in the hands of his banker so payable. | Three years. | When the demand is made. |
23. | For money payable to the plaintiff for money paid for the defendant. | Three years. | When the money is paid |
24. | For money payable by the defendant to the plaintiff for money received by the defendant, for the plaintiff's use. | Three years. | When the money is received. |
25. | For money payable for interest upon money due from the defendant to the plaintiff | Three years. | When the interest becomes due. |
26. | For money payable to the plaintiff for money found to be due from the defendant to the plaintiff on accounts stated between them. | Three years. | When the accounts are stated in writing signed by the defendant or his agent duly authorised in this behalf, unless where the debt is, by a simultaneous agreement in writing signed as aforesaid, made payable at a future time, and then when that time arrives. |
27. | For compensation for breach of a promise to do anything at a specified time, or upon the happening of a specifiedcontingency. | Three years. | When the time specified arrives or the contingency happens. |
28. | On a single bond, where a day is specified for payment. | Three years. | The day so specified. |
29. | On a single bond, where no such day is specified. | Three years. | The date of executing the bond. |
30. | On a bond subject to a condition. | Three years. | When the condition is broken. |
Sl. No. | Description of suit | Period of limitation | Time from which period begins to run |
---|---|---|---|
31. | On a bill of exchange or promissory note payable at a fixed time after date. | Three years. | When the bill or note falls due. |
32. | On a bill of exchange payable at sight, or after sight, but not at a fixed time. | Three years. | When the bill is presented. |
33. | On a bill of exchange accepted payable at a particular place. | Three years. | When the bill is presented at that place. |
34. | On a bill of exchange or promissory note payable at a fixed time after sight or after demand. | Three years | When the fixe time expires. |
35. | On a bill of exchange or promissory note payable on demand and not accompanied by any writing restraining or postponing the right to sue. | Three years. | The date of the bill or note. |
36. | On a promissory note or bond payable by instalments. | Three years. | The expiration of the first term of payment as to the part then payable; and for the other parts, the expiration of the respective terms of payment. |
37. | On a promissory note or bond payable by instalments, which provides that, if default be made in payment of one or more instalments, the whole shall be due. | Three years. | When the default is made, unless where the payee or obligee waives the benefit of the provision and then when fresh default is made in respect of which there is no such waiver. |
38. | On a promissory note given by the maker to a third person to be delivered to the payee after a certain event should happen. | Three years. | The date of the delivery to the payee. |
39. | On a dishonoured foreign bill where protest has been made and notice given. | Three years. | When the notice is given. |
40. | By the payee against the drawer of a bill of exchange, which has been dishonoured by non-acceptance. | Three years. | The date of the refusal to accept. |
41. | By the acceptor of an accommodation-bill against the drawer. | Three years. | When the acceptor pays the amount of the bill. |
42. | By a surety against the principal debtor. | Three years. | When the surety pays the creditor. |
43. | By a surety against a co-surety | Three years. | When the surety pays anything in excess of his own share. |
44. | (a)On a policy of insurance when the sum insured is payable after proof of the death has been given to or received by the insurers. | Three years. | The date of the death of the deceased, or where the claim on the policy is denied, either partly or wholly, the date of such denial. |
(b) On a policy of insurance when the sum insured is payable after proof of the loss has been given to or received by insurers. | Three years. | The date of occurrence causing the loss, or where the claim on, the policy is denied, either partly or wholly, the date of such denial. |
Article 44.- The Committee feel that in cases where a claim is denied, whether wholly or in part, by an insurer the plaintiff should be entitled to have the period of limitation computed from the date of such denial.Column 3 against item (a) has been amended accordingly.-J.C.R.–Gaz.of Ind., 20-11-1962, Pt.II-S.2, Ext.p.1034.
Sl. No. | Description of suit | Period of limitation | Time from which period begins to run |
---|---|---|---|
45. | By the assured to recover premia paid under a policy voidable at the election of the insurers. | Three years. | When the insurers elect to avoid the policy. |
46. | Under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, section 360 or section 361, to compel a refund by a person to whom an executor or administrator has paid a legacy or distributed assets. | Three years. | The date of the payment or distribution. |
47. | For money paid upon an existing consideration which afterwards fails. | Three years. | The date of the failure. |
48. | For contribution by a party who has paid the whole or more than his share of the amount due under a joint decree, or by a sharer in a oint estate who has paid the whole or more than his share of the amount of revenue due from himself and his co-sharers. | Three years. | The date of the payment in excess of the plaintiff's own share. |
49. | By a co-trustee to enforce against the estate of a deceased trustee a claim for contribution. | Three years. | When the right to contribution accrues. |
50. | By the manager of a joint estate of an undivided family for contribution, in respect of a payment made by him on account of the estate. | Three years. | The date of the payment. |
51. | For the profits of immovable property belonging to the plaintiff which have been wrongfully received by the defendant. | Three years. | When the profits are received. |
52. | For arrears of rent. | Three years. | When the arrears become due. |
53. | By a vendor of immovable property for personal payment of unpaid purchase-money. | Three years. | The time fixed for completing the sale, or (where the title is accepted after the time fixed for completion) the date of the acceptance. |
54. | For specific performance of a contract. | Three years. | The date fixed for the performance, or, if no such date is fixed, when the plaintiff has notice that performance is refused. |
55. | For compensation for the breach of any contract, express or implied not specially provided for. | Three years. | When the contract is broken or (where there are successive breaches) when the breach in respect of which the suit is instituted occur or (where the breach is continuing) when it ceases. |
Sl. No. | Description of suit | Period of limitation | Time from which period begins to run | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PART III.-SUITS RELATING TO DECLARATIONS | ||||
56. | To declare the forgery of an instrument issued or registered. | Three years. | When the issue or registration becomes known to the plaintiff. | |
57. | To obtain a declaration that an alleged adoption is invalid, or never in fact, took place. | Three years. | When the alleged adoption becomes known to the plaintiff. | |
58. | To obtain any other declaration. | Three years. | When the right to sue first accrues. | |
PART IV - SUITS RELATING TO DECREES AND INSTRUMENTS. | ||||
59. | To cancel or set aside an instrument or decree or for the rescission of a contract. | Three years. | When the facts entitling the plaintiff to have the instrument or decree cancelled or set aside or the contract rescinded first become known to him. | |
OBJECTS AND REASONS | ||||
Article 59 combines existing Arts.91 and 114-S.C.R. | ||||
60. | To set aside a transfer of property made by the guardian of a ward- | |||
(a) by the ward who has attained majority; | Three years. | When the ward attains majority. | ||
(b) by the ward's legal representative- | ||||
(i) when the ward dies within three years from the date of attaining majority; | Three years. | When the ward attains majority. | ||
(ii) when the ward dies before attaining majority. | Three years. | When the ward dies. | ||
OBJECTS AND REASONS | ||||
Article 59 combines existing articles 19 and 114, and 60 reproduces existing article 44 but is amplified to cover cases where the ward dies before attaining majority or within three years after attaining majority S.O.R.-Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.II-S.2, Ext., p.467. | ||||
PART V - SUITS RELATING TO IMMOVABLE PROPERTY. | ||||
61. | By a mortgagor | |||
(a) to redeem or recover possession of immovable property mortgaged; | Three years. | When the right to redeem or to recover possession accrues. | ||
(b) to recover possession of immovable property mortgaged and afterwards transferred by the mortgagee for a valuable consideration; | Three years. | When the transfer becomes known to the plaintiff. | ||
(c) to recover surplus collections received by the mortgagee after the mortgage has been satisfied. | Three years. | When the mortgagor re-enters on the mortgaged property. | ||
OBJECTS AND REASONS | ||||
"Article 61 replaces existing articles 148, 134, (in so far as it relates to mortgages) and 105 with the modification that in respect of suits for redemption the period is being reduced from 60 years to 30 years (and not to 12 years as recommended by the Law Commission)."S.O.R.-Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.II-S.2, Ext., p.467. | ||||
62. | To enforce payment of money secured by a mortgage or otherwise charged upon immovable property. | Three years. | When the money sued for becomes due. | |
OBJECTS AND REASONS | ||||
"Article 62 replaces existing Article 132, at the same time making it clear that the article applies to mortgage also."-S.O.R.-Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.II, S.2, Ext., p.467. | ||||
63. | By a mortgagee:- | |||
(a) for foreclosure; | Thirty years. | When the money secured by the mortgage becomes due. | ||
(b) for possession of immovable property mortgaged. | Twelve years. | When the mortgagee becomes entitled to possession. |
Sl. No. | Description of suit | Period of limitation | Time from which period begins to run |
---|---|---|---|
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
"Article 63 replaces existing Articles 147, 135 and 146, the period of limitation in respect of suits for foreclosure being reduced from 60 years to 30 years in conformity with the period now being prescribed, for suits for redemption"-S.O.R.Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.II, S.2, Ext.p.467. | |||
64. | For possession of immovable property based on previous possession and not on title, when the plaintiff while in possession of the property has been dispossessed. | Twelve years. | The date of dispossession. |
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
Article 142 and 144 of the existing Act have given rise to a good deal of confusion with respect to suits for possession by owners of property.Article 64 as proposed replaces article 142, but is restricted to suits based on possessory title so that an owner of property does not lose his right to the property unless the defendant in possession is able to prove adverse possession.-S.O.R.Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.II, S.2, Ext., p.467. | |||
65. | For possession of immovable property or any interest therein based on title. | Twelve years. | When the possession of the defendant becomes adverse to the plaintiff. |
Explanation.-For the purposes of this article- | |||
(a) where the suit is by a remainderman, a reversioner (other than a landlord) or a devisee, the possession of the defendant shall be deemed to become adverse only when the estate of the remainderman, reversioner or devisee, as the case may be, falls into possession; | |||
(b) where the suit by a Hindu or Muslim entitled to the possession of immovable property on the death of a Hindu or Muslim female, the possession of the defendant shall be deemed to become adverse only when the female dies; | |||
(c) where the suit is by a purchaser at a sale in execution of a decree when the judgment-debtor was out of possession at the date of the sale, the purchaser shall be deemed to be a representative of the judgment-debtor who was out of possession. | |||
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
Article 65 is new and deals with suits based on title.This will cover existing articles 136, 137, and 138 which are all suits based on title-that is to say suits based on the title of the predecessor-in-interest of the purchaser, whether under an ordinary purchase or an execution sale.Existing article 47 may also be left to be covered by the new article 65 as recommended by the Law Commission in para 124 of its Report.In view of article 65, existing article 144 is unnecessary.The provisions of existing articles 140 and 141 are being incorporated as suitable explanations to the new article 65.The last explanation to the new article 65 is intended to make it clear that a purchaser at a sale in execution of a decree shall be deemed to be a representative of the judgment-debtor who was out of possession at the date of the sale although it may be unnecessary in view of the definition of "plaintiff" which includes a person from or through whom the plaintiff derives his right to sue.-S.O.R.Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.Ii, S.2, Ext., pp.467-468. | |||
STATE AMENDMENTS | |||
Bihar | |||
In its application to the Scheduled Areas in the State of Bihar, in Art.65, in the second column, following words shall be added at the end, namely:- | |||
"but 30 years in respect of immovable property belonging to a member of the Scheduled Tribes as specified in part III to the Schedule to the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950." | |||
-Bih.Regn.1 of 1969, S.3 and Sch.(8-2-1969). | |||
Orissa | |||
In its application to the Scheduled Areas in the State of Orissa, in Art.65, second column, following words added at the end, namely: | |||
"but thirty years in relation to immovable property belonging to a member of a Scheduled Tribe specified in respect of the State of Orissa in the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950." | |||
Orissa Regn.1of 1975, S.5 (12-12-1975) | |||
66. | For possession of immovable property when the plaintiff has become entitled to possession by reason of any forfeiture or breach of condition. | Twelve years. | When the forfeiture is incurred or the condition is broken. |
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
Articles 66 and 67 reproduce existing articles 143 and 139.-Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.Ii, S.2, Ext., p.468. | |||
67. | By a landlord to recover possession from a tenant. | Twelve years. | When the tenancy is determined. |
PART VI - SUITS RELATING TO MOVABLE PROPERTY | |||
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
Articles 68, 69, 70 and 71 reproduce existing articles 48 (first part), 49 (first part), 145 and 48A (second party) respectively.In the new article 70, the date of refusal after demand is made the starting point of limitation and there would then be no need for a 30 year period as in the existing article 145."-S.O.R.Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.II, S.2, Ext., p.468. | |||
68. | For specific movable property lost, or acquired by theft, or dishonest misappropriation or conversion. | Three years. | When the person having the right to the possession of the property first learns in whose possession it is. |
69. | For other specific movable property. | Three years. | When the property is wrongfully taken. |
70. | To recover movable property deposited or pawned from a depositary or pawnee. | Three years. | The date of refusal after demand. |
Sl. No. | Description of suit | Period of limitation | Time from which period begins to run |
---|---|---|---|
71. | To recover movable property deposited or pawned, and afterwards bought from the depositary or pawnee for a valuable consideration. | Three years. | When the sale becomes known to the plaintiff. |
PART VII—SUITS RELATING TO TORT. OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
"Articles 72 to 91 which correspond to existing articles 2, 19 to 29 and 32 to 42 deal with suits based on tort.Most of the existing articles are being retained and the existing periods of limitation are also not being changed except in a few cases.For example, the new article 72 which reproduces existing article 2 increases the period from ninety days to one year as being more reasonable.Articles 22 and 36 have been omitted in favour of the residuary article 113."-S.O.R.Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.ii, S.2, Ext., p.468. | |||
72. | For compensation for doing or for omitting to do an act alleged to be in pursuance of any enactment in force for the time being in the territories to which this Act extends. | One year. | When the act or omission takeplace. |
73. | For compensation for false imprisonment. | One year. | When the imprisonment ends. |
74. | For compensation for a malicious prosecution. | One year. | When the plaintiff is acquitted or the prosecution is otherwise terminated. |
75. | For compensation for libel. | One year. | When the libel is published. |
76. | For compensation for slander. | One year. | When the words are spoken, or if the words are not actionable in themselves, when the special damage complained of results. |
77. | For compensation for loss of service occasioned by the seduction of the plaintiff's servant or daughter. | One year. | When the loss occurs. |
78. | For compensation for inducing a person to break a contract with the plaintiff. | One year. | The date of the breach. |
79. | For compensation for an illegal, irregular or excessive distress. | One year. | The date of the distress. |
80. | For compensation for wrongful seizure of movable property under legal process. | One year | The date of the seizure. |
81. | By executors, administrators or representatives under the Legal Representatives Suits Act, 1855. | One year. | The date of the death of the person wronged. |
82. | By executors, administrators or representatives under the Indian Fatal Accidents Act,1855. | Two years. | The date of the death of theperson killed. |
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
Article 82- The committee feel the limitation of one year provided for suits under the Indian Fatal Accidents Act, 1855, is short and should be increased to two years.-J.C.R.Gaz.of Ind., 20-11-1962, Pt.II, section 2, Ext., p.1034. | |||
83. | Under the Legal Represen -tatives' Suits Act, 1855, against an executor, an administrator or any other representative. | Two years. | When the wrong complained of is done. |
84. | Against one who, having a right to use property for specific purposes, perverts it to other purposes. | Two years. | When the perversion first becomes known to the person injured thereby. |
Sl. No. | Description of suit | Period of limitation | Time from which period begins to run | |
---|---|---|---|---|
85. | For compensation for obstructing a way or a water course. | Three years. | The date of the obstruction. | |
86. | For compensation for diverting a water course. | Three years. | The date of the diversion. | |
87. | For compensation for trespass upon immovable property. | Three years. | The date of the trespass. | |
88. | For compensation for infringing copyright or any other exclusive privilege. | Three years. | The date of the infringement. | |
89. | To restrain waste. | Three years. | When the waste begins. | |
90. | For compensation for injurycaused by an injunction wrongfully obtained. | Three years. | When the injunction ceases. | |
91. | For compensation,- | |||
(a) for wrongfully taking or detaining any specific movable property lost, or acquired by theft, or dishonest misappropriation or conversion; | Three years. | When the person having the right to the possession of the property first learns in whose possession it is; | ||
(b) for wrongfully taking or injuring or wrongfully detaining any other specific movable property. | Three years. | When the property is wrongfully taken or injured, or when the detainer's possession becomes unlawful. | ||
PART VIII - SUITS RELATING TO TRUSTS AND TRUST PROPERTY | ||||
92. | To recover possession of immovable property conveyed or bequeathed in trust and afterwards transferred by the trustee for a valuable consideration. | Twelve years. | When the transfer becomes known to the plaintiff. | |
OBJECTS AND REASONS | ||||
Articles 92 to 96 reproduce respectively existing articles 134 (first part), 48A (first part), 134A, 48B, 134B and 134C. | ||||
In the new article 96 replacing existing articles 134B and 13C, an amendment is made whereby the date of appointment of a new manager is also made the starting point of limitation in suitable cases.-S.O.R.Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-1962, Pt.II, section 2, Ext., p.468. | ||||
93. | To recover possession o movable property conveyed or bequeathed in trust and afterwards transferred by the trustee for a valuable consideration. | Three years. | When the transfer becomes known to the plaintiff. | |
94. | To set aside a transfer of immovable property comprised in a Hindu, Muslim or Buddhist religious or charitable endowment, made by a manager thereof for a valuable consideration. | Twelve years. | When the transfer becomes known to the plaintiff. | |
95. | To set aside a transfer of immovable property comprised in a Hindu, Muslim or Buddhist religious or charitable endowment, made by a manager thereof for a valuable consideration. | Three years. | When the transfer becomes known to the plaintiff. | |
96. | By the manager of a Hindu, Muslim or Buddhist religious or charitable endowment to recover possession of movable or immovable property comprised in the endowment which has been transferred by a previous manager for avaluable consideration. | Twelve years. | he date of death, resignation or removal of the transferor or the date of appointment of the plaintiff as manager of the endowment, whichever is later. |
Sl. No. | Description of suit | Period of limitation | Time from which period begins to run |
---|---|---|---|
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
Please Refer article 91. | |||
PART IX - SUITS RELATING TO MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS | |||
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
This part groups together articles which cannot be included within any of the earlier parts.-S.O.R.Gaz.of Ind., | |||
97. | To enforce a right of emption whether the right is founded on law or general usage or on special contract. | One year. | When the purchaser takes under the pre-sale sought to be impeached, physical possession of the whole or part of the property sold, or, here the subject-matter of the sale does not admit of physical possession of the whole or part of the property, when the instrument of sale is registered. |
98. | By a person against whom 1[an order referred to in rule 63 or in rule 103] of Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 or an order under section 28 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882, has been made, to establish the right which he claims to the property comprised in theorder. | One year. | The date of the final order. |
99. | To set aside a sale by a civil or revenue Court or a sale for arrears of Government revenue or for any demand recoverable as such arrears. | One year. | When the sale is confirmed or would otherwise have become final and conclusive had no such suit been brought. |
100. | To alter or set aside any decision or order of a Civil Court in any proceeding other than a suit or any act or order of an officer of Government in his official capacity. | One year. | The date of the final decision or order by the Court or the date of the act or order of the officer, as the case may be. |
101. | Upon a judgment including a foreign judgment, or a recognisance. | Three years. | The date of the judgment or recognisance. |
102. | For property which the plaintiff has conveyed while insane. | Three years. | When the plaintiff is restored to sanity and has knowledge of the conveyance. |
103. | To make good out of the general estate of a deceased trustee the loss occasioned by a breach of trust. | Three years. | The date of the trustee's death or if the loss has not then resulted, the date of the loss. |
104. | To establish a periodically recurring right. | Three years. | When the plaintiff is first refused the enjoyment of the right. |
105. | By a Hindu for arrears of maintenance. | Three years. | When the arrears are payable. |
106. | For a legacy or for a share of a residue bequeathed by a testator or for a distributive share of the property of an intestate against an executor or an administrator or some other person legally charged with the duty of distributing the estate. | Twelve years. | When the legacy or share becomes payable or deliverable. |
[1] Substituted for the words "an order under rule 63 or rule 103", by the repealing and Amending Act, 1964 (52 of 1964), section 3 and Second Sch.(29-12-1994). |
Sl. No. | Description of suit | Period of limitation | Time from which period begins to run |
---|---|---|---|
107. | For possession of a hereditary office. | Twelve years. | When the defendant takes possession of the office adversely to the plaintiff. |
Explanation.-A hereditary office is possessed when the properties thereof are usually received, or (if there are no properties) when the duties thereof are usually performed. | |||
108. | Suit during the life of a Hindu or Muslim female by a Hindu or who, if the female died at the date of instituting the suit, would be entitled to the possession of land, to have an alienation of such land made by the female declared to be void except for her life or until her remarriage. | Twelve years. | The date of the alienation. |
109. | By a Hindu governed by Mitakshara law to set aside his father's alienation of ancestral property. | Twelve years | When the alienee takes possession of the property. |
110. | By a person excluded from a joint family property to enforce right to share therein. | Twelve years. | When the exclusion becomes known to the plaintiff. |
111. | By or on behalf of any local authority for possession of any public street or road or any part thereof from which it has been dispossessed or of which it has discontinued the possession. | Thirty years. | The date of the dispossession or discontinuance. |
112. | Any suit (except a suit before the Supreme Court in the exercise of its original jurisdiction) by or on behalf of the Central Government or any State Government including the Government of the State of Jammu and Kashmir. | Thirty years. | When the period of limitation would begin to run under this Act against a like suit by a private person. |
PART X - SUITS FOR WHICH THERE IS NO PRESCRIBED PERIOD. | |||
113. | Any suit for which no period of limitation is provided elsewhere in this Schedule. | Three years. | When the right to sue accrues. |
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
Article 113 (which corresponds to existing article 120) is the residuary article for cases not covered by the earlier parts and the period is fixed at three years so that no special advantage would be gained by anyone seeking to prove that the residuary article applies."-S.O.R.Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-62, Pt.II, S.2, Ext., p.469. |
Sl. No. | Description of appeal | Period of Limitation | Time from which period beginst o run |
---|---|---|---|
114. | Appeal from an order of acquittal,- | ||
(a)under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) of section 417 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898; | Ninety days. | The date of the order appealed from. | |
(b) under sub-section (3) of section 417 of that Code. | Thirty days. | The date of the grant of special leave. | |
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
"Articles 114 replaces existing article 157 with the addition that appeals against orders of acquittal in cases instituted on private complaints where special leave has been obtained should be filed within one month from the grant of leave."-S.O.R.Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-62, Pt.II, S.2, Ext., p.469. |
Sl. No. | Description of appeal | Period of Limitation | Time from which period beginst o run |
---|---|---|---|
115. | Under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898— | ||
(a) from a sentence of death passed by a Court of Session or by a High Court in the exercise of its original criminal jurisdiction; | Thirty days. | The date of the sentence. | |
(b) from any other sentence or any order not being an order of acquittal- | |||
(i) to the High Court | Sixty days. | The date of the sentence or order. | |
(ii) to any other Court | Thirty days. | The date of the sentence or order. | |
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
Article 115 combines existing articles 150, 152, 154, 155, 156 and provides a period of 30 days for all appeals.-S.O.R.-Gaz.of India, 19-6-62, Pt.II-S.2, Ext., p.469. | |||
Article 115 and Article 116 (New).- In the opinion of the Committee, Article 115 should be re-drafted so that in the case of sentences or orders other than sentences of death or orders of acquittal the period for appeals under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, to the High Court should be increased from thirty days to sixty days.Similarly, in the case of appeals under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to the High Court, the period should be increased from thirty days to ninety days.Article 115 has been re-drafted accordingly, and suitable provisions in this behalf have made in the new Articles 115 and 116 – Gaz.of India, 20-11-62, Pt.II-S.2, Ext., p.1034. | |||
116. | Under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908,- | ||
(a) to a High Court from any decree or order; | Ninety days. | The date of the decree or order. | |
(b) to any other Court from any decree or order. | Thirty days. | The date of the decree or order. | |
117. | From a decree or order of any High Court to the same Court. | Thirty days. | The date of the decree or order. |
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
Article 116 (now Art.117) replaces relating Article 151 and provides a period of thirty days for all appeals to a High Court against its own decrees or orders.-S.O.R.-Gaz.of India, 19-6-62, Pt.II-S.2, Ext., p.469. |
Sl. No. | Description of application | Period of limitation | Time from which period begins to run |
---|---|---|---|
THIRD DIVISION - APPLICATIONS | |||
PART I - APPLICATIONS IN SPECIFIED CASES | |||
118. | For leave to appear and defend a suit under summary procedure. | Ten days. | When the summons is served. |
119. | Under the Arbitration Act, 1940,- | ||
(a) for the filing in Court of an award; | Thirty days. | The date of service of the notice of the making of the award; | |
(b) for setting aside an award or getting an award remitted for reconsideration. | Thirty days. | The date of service of the notice of the filing of the award. | |
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
Article 118 (now Art.119), combines existing Articles 178 and 158 and provides a uniform period of 30 days.-S.O.R.-Gaz.of India, 19-6-62, Pt.II-S.2, Ext., p.470. | |||
120. | Under the Code of Civil Procedure,1908, to have the legal representative of a deceased plaintiff or appellant or of a deceased defendant or respondent, made a party. | Ninety days. | The date of death of the plaintiff, appellant, defendant or respondent as the case may be. |
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
Articles 120 and 121 (Original articles 119 and 120.- The Committee feel that the limitation of thirty days provided for the applications specified in these articles should be increased from thirty days to ninety days and sixty days respectively.-L.J.R.-Gaz.of Ind., 20-11-62, Pt.II, S.2, Ext., Pp.1034, 1035. | |||
121. | Under the same Code for an order to set aside an abatement. | Sixty days. | The date of abatement. |
122. | To restore a suit or appeal or application for review or revision dismissed for default of appearance or for want of prosecution or for failure to pay costs of service of process or to furnish security for costs. | Thirty days. | The date of dismissal. |
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
"Article 121 (now Article 122), in replacement of existing Articles 160, 163, 168 and 172, provides uniform period of 30 days for setting aside orders of dismissal for defaults, like failure to appear etc."-S.O.R.-Gaz.of India, 19-6-62.Pt.II-S.2, Ext., p.470. |
Sl. No. | Description of application | Period of limitation | Time from which period begins to run |
---|---|---|---|
123. | To set aside a decree passed ex parte or to rehear an appeal decreed or heard ex parte. | Thirty days. | The date of the decree or where the summons or notice was not duly served, when the applicant had knowledge of the decree. |
Explanation.—For the purpose of this article, substituted service under rule 20 of Order V of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) shall not be deemed to be due service. | |||
"Article 122 (now Article 123) combines existing Articles 164 and 169.The Explanation seeks to override the case-law that the expression "duly served" in column 3 includes substituted service".-S.O.R.-Gaz.of India, 19-6-62, Pt.II, S.2, Ext.p.470. | |||
124. | For a review of judgment by a Court other than the Supreme Court. | Thirty days. | The date of the decree or order. |
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
"Article 123 (now Article 124) groups together existing Articles 161, 162 and 173 and provides a uniform period of 30 days for all cases of review."-S.O.R.-Gaz.of India, 19-6-62, Pt.II-S.2, Ext.p.420. | |||
125. | To record an adjustment or satisfaction of a decree. | Thirty days. | When the payment or adjustment is made. |
126. | For the payment of the amount of a decree by instalments. | Thirty days. | The date of the decree. |
127. | To set aside a sale in execution of the decree, including any such application by a judgment-debtor. | 1[Sixty days]. | The date of the sale. |
128. | For possession by one dispossessed of immovable property and disputing the right of the decree-holder or purchaser at a sale in execution of a decree. | Thirty days. | The date of the dispossession. |
129. | For possession after removing resistance or obstruction to delivery of possession of immovable property decreed or sold in execution of a decree. | Thirty days. | The date of resistance or obstruction. |
130. | For leave to appeal as a pauper— | ||
(a) to the High Court | Sixty days. | The date of decree appealed from. | |
(b) to any other Court | Thirty days. | The date of decree appealed from. | |
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
Article 130 (original Article 129).- The Committee consider that the period of thirty days provided for application for leave to appeal to the High Court as a pauper should be increased from thirty days to sixty days.The article has been re-drafted accordingly.-J.C.R.-Gaz.of Ind., 20-11-62, Pt.II-S.2, Ext., p.1035. | |||
131. | To any Court for the exercise of its powers of revision under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 or the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898. | Ninety days. | The date of the decree or order or sentence sought to be revised. |
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
Article 131 (original Article 130).- This Article seeks to prescribe a uniform period of limitation for the exercise of revisional powers under the two procedural Codes but in the opinion of the Committee the period of thirty days is too short and should be increased to ninety days."-J.C.R.-Gaz.of Ind., 20-11-1962, Pt.II, S.2, Ext., pp.1034, 1035. | |||
132. | To the High Court for a certificate of fitness to appeal to the Supreme Court under Cl.(1) of Article 132, Article 133 or sub-clause (c) of Clause (1) of Article 134 of the Constitution or under any other law for the time being in force. | Sixty days. | The date of the decree, order or sentence. |
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
Articles 131 and 132 (now Articles 132 and 133).- Replace existing Articles 153 and 179 by more comprehensive provisions for application to the High Court for the certificate of fitness to appeals to the Supreme Court or for special leave to appeal to the Supreme Court in all civil and criminal matters."-S.O.R.-Gaz.of Ind., Pt.II, S.2, Ext.p.470. | |||
[1] Substituted for the words "thirty days" by Act 104 of 1976, S.98, (1-2-1977). |
Sl. No. | Description of application | Period of limitation | Time from which period beginsto run |
---|---|---|---|
133. | To the Supreme Court for special leave to appeal,-- | ||
(a) in a case involving death sentence; | Sixty days. | The date of the judgment, final order or sentence. | |
(b) in a case where leave to appeal was refused by the High Court; | Sixty days. | The date of the order of refusal. | |
(c) in any of other case. | Ninety days. | The date of the judgment or order. | |
134. | For delivery of possession by a purchaser of immovable property at a sale in execution of a decree. | One year. | When the sale becomes absolute. |
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
Article 133.- "As existing Article 182 is being omitted, Article 180, which the proposed Article 133 (now Article 134) seeks to replace, will apply to all purchasers in execution, whether decree-holders or not.The period, however, is being reduced to one year from three years." S.O.R.– Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-62, Pt.II-S.2, p.470. | |||
135. | For the enforcement of a decree granting a mandatory injunction. | Three years. | T he date of the decree or where adate is fixed for performance, such date. |
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
Article 135.- "Existing Article 182 has been a fruitful source of litigation and therefore the proposed Article 135, (now Article 136) in lieu thereof, provides that the maximum period of limitation for the execution of a decree or order of any Civil Court shall be 12 years from the date when the decree or order became enforceable (which is usually the date of the decree or order) or, where the decree or subsequent order directs any payment of money or delivery of any property to be made at a certain date or at recurring periods, from the date of the default in making the payment or delivery in respect of which the applicant seeks to execute the decree or order.There is no reason why a decree should be kept alive for more than 12 years.Section 48 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, provides that a decree ceases to be enforceable after 12 years.In England also the time fixed for enforcing a judgment is 12 years.Where, however, the judgment-debtor has by fraud or force prevented the execution of a decree within the prescribed period, suitable provisions for extending the period are being made in clause 16 (now S.17) of the Bill on the lines of section 48 (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. | |||
Existing Article 183, which makes special provision for decrees and order of Courts established by Royal Charter, is no longer necessary. | |||
It is also provided that the period of 12 years will not apply to decrees granting perpetual injunctions." S.O.R.-Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-62, Pt.II-S.2, Ext., pp.470, 471. | |||
136. | For the execution of any decree (other than a decree granting a mandatory injunction) or order of any Civil Court. | Twelve years. | 1[When] the decree or order becomes enforceable or where the decree or any subsequent order directs any payment of money or the delivery of any property to be made at a certain date or at recurring periods when default in making the payment or delivery in respect of which execution is sought, takes place : Provided that an application for the enforcement or execution of a decree granting a perpetual injunction shall not be subject to any period of limitation. |
[1] Substituted for the word "Where" by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1964(52 of 1964), S.3 and Second Sch.(28-12-1964). | |||
Existing Article 183, which makes special provision for decrees and order of Courts established by Royal Charter, is no longer necessary. | |||
It is also provided that the period of 12 years will not apply to decrees granting perpetual injunctions."-S.O.R.-Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-62, Pt.II-S.2, Ext., pp.470, 471. | |||
PART II – OTHER APPLICATIONS | |||
137. | Any other application for which no period of limitation is provided elsewhere in this Division. | Three years. | When the right to apply accrues. |
OBJECTS AND REASONS | |||
"As in the case of suits, Article 136 (now Art.137) which corresponds to existing Article 181, is the residuary article for all applications, including petitions." | |||
Existing Articles 1, 3, 5, 6, 15, 16, 17, 18, 45, 46, 103, 104, 112, 121 and 130 have been omitted as recommended by the Law Commission.S.O.R.-Gaz.of Ind., 19-6-62, Pt.II-S.2, Ext., p.471. |